2. Canada’s tax treaty with China -

2. Canada’s tax treaty with China

The definition of a “permanent establishment” under the Canada-China Income Tax Agreement (1986) is predicated upon any of: (i) a place; (ii) a person; or (iii) time allocation.

(a) Places

A permanent establishment as a place means a “fixed place of business”; that is, a physical location controlled by, and identifiable by prospective clients with, the non-resident taxpayer. Aside from owning or leasing space, the taxpayer may have a permanent establishment if it is permitted to use the office of a subsidiary or a client. Factors to be considered include but are not limited to whether the taxpayer has a key to the premises and access at any hour, whether it uses the premises of one client to service other clients and whether it hangs its own shingle in the lobby or hands out business cards with the address or phone number of those premises.

The Canada Revenue Agency has, in the past, determined that the premises of a subsidiary were a fixed place of business of its non-resident parent. The argument is that the subsidiary, although it is a separate legal entity, is merely the agent of the non-resident. The following may be helpful in avoiding this situation:

  • agreements between the non-resident taxpayer and any Canadian subsidiary should be clear that the subsidiary is an independent third party engaged in its own business, not the non-resident taxpayer’s agent acting as part of the non-resident taxpayer’s business; and
  • these agreements should make it clear that the Canadian subsidiary does not have the authority to receive orders, negotiate with clients or conclude contracts on behalf of the non-resident taxpayer, or assume any obligation on behalf of the non-resident taxpayer; they should also make clear that the Canadian subsidiary cannot hold itself out as an agent, a representative or a partner of the non-resident parent.

(b) Persons

The second concept is that of a permanent establishment as a person. A person can be a permanent establishment if it has and habitually exercises in Canada the authority to contract on behalf of the non-resident taxpayer. If circumstances permit, this situation can be avoided simply by denying any person in Canada the authority to execute contracts on the non-resident taxpayer’s behalf.

(c) Time allocation

A third concept applies if services are provided in Canada by employees or other personnel for an aggregate of 183 days or more in any 12-month period and those services are in respect of the same or a  “connected” project.

“Connected” Projects

Projects that are subject to different contracts may nevertheless be “connected” for the purposes of the time-allocation concept. In general, projects are connected if they constitute a “coherent whole”, both commercially and geographically. Relevant factors include:

  • whether the projects would, in the absence of tax planning considerations, have been concluded pursuant to a single contract;
  • whether the nature of the work involved under different projects is the same; and
  • whether the same individuals provide the services for the different projects.

 ‹ 1. Canada’s typical income tax treaty  up

III. Canada’s tax treaty with the United States? ›


About The Author

There are no comments yet, but you can be the first



Comments are closed.

WEBSITE © SORBARALAW